Re: is it a bug in rule system?

From: laser <laserlist(at)pgsqldb(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is it a bug in rule system?
Date: 2008-05-28 08:59:33
Message-ID: 483D1EF5.7040409@pgsqldb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am Wed, dem 28.05.2008, um 15:56:22 +0800 mailte laser folgendes:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> see query below:
>>
>> create table ruleTest(id integer, name text);
>>
>> create or replace rule ruleTest_insert_rule AS on insert to ruleTest
>> where exists(select 1 from ruleTest where ruleTest.name = NEW.name)
>> do instead (update ruleTest set id = id+1 where ruleTest.name = NEW.name);
>>
>> I think the id should be 1, cause the rule condition should only affect
>> exist row,
>> but ISTM the rule act like a DO ALSO rule: insert the row first, then
>> update it.
>>
>> any hints?
>>
>
> Yes, use a TRIGGER instead a RULE for such tasks.
>
>

thanks, good to know it's a bug and we'll try TRIGGER approach.

thanks and best regards

-laser

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-05-28 11:14:19 Re: is it a bug in rule system?
Previous Message Kaloyan Iliev 2008-05-28 08:30:46 Re: Open Source CRM - Options?