Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] National community sites @ postgresql.org?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] National community sites @ postgresql.org?
Date: 2008-05-07 15:05:43
Message-ID: 4821C547.5050502@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Selena, All,

I don't think a policy is a good idea.

I think for those communities who want to operate their own sites (Fr, 
DE, Br, IT, etc) we should redirect to them.*  For communities who don't 
want to operate their own sites (as, I guess, RU doesn't), we should 
host them on postgresql.org.

Why push a policy that isn't in line with what people want/need?

--Josh

* also, how do we handle domains (IT particularly) which have more than 
one site?



In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-05-07 15:05:54
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-05-07 15:04:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2008-05-07 15:20:28
Subject: Re: Bolder vision of pg certification
Previous:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2008-05-07 15:03:20
Subject: Re: Bolder vision of pg certification

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group