| From: | Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
| Date: | 2008-04-30 15:36:55 |
| Message-ID: | 48189217.2010307@obviously.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> This patch seems sufficiently controversial that "commit now" is the
> very last thing that should happen to it.
>
> I suggest committing the PrintTable stuff and not worrying about whether
> that breaks the wrap patch.
>
> regards, tom lane\
>
AFIK, the only thing that's controversial about the patch is how to turn
it on and off -- the actual core code appears to be inflaming no
passions. And it's the core code that presents merge issues.
Could it be committed with a hidden enable syntax, for the interim? Or
even no enable syntax, just to have it in the code base?
\pset format wrap-beta-test on
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-30 15:45:29 | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
| Previous Message | Thomas Mueller | 2008-04-30 15:22:50 | Re: Protection from SQL injection |