Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

From: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,"Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>,"Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>,"postgres performance list" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
Date: 2008-04-28 10:59:48
Message-ID: 4815AE24.60909@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-performance
Gregory Stark wrote:
> TPC-E has more stringent requirements which explicitly require very consistent
> response times and I doubt 8.2 would have been able to pass them.

Sure it would. Just not for a very large scale factor ;-).

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Gauri KanekarDate: 2008-04-28 13:38:56
Subject: Replication Syatem
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-04-28 09:17:08
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-04-28 16:07:36
Subject: Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-04-28 09:17:08
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group