From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Raphaël Jacquot <sxpert(at)sxpert(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: we don't have a bugzilla |
Date: | 2008-04-26 17:37:34 |
Message-ID: | 4813685E.1030302@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> How would he know to search at the archives?
>
> If he knew enough about the community to post in -hackers (as opposed
> to, say, -general or -novice) he should certainly have heard of the
You think so? (not being sarcastic).
> mailing list archives. *You* might find 'em useless but I don't.
I didn't say I found them useless. I said they are useless unless you
know what you are looking for. I am pretty sure that when it comes to
PostgreSQL, you always know what you are looking for.
Anyway, now I am off-topic, so I am done with this thread.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-04-26 18:20:15 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-26 17:34:39 | Re: we don't have a bugzilla |