Re: Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout
Date: 2008-04-17 19:48:27
Message-ID: 4807A98B.2000600@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> A use case would be dumping a large table and wanting to
> load it into the database, but wanting to stop the job if it
> is still running an hour from now, when a maintenance window
> is scheduled to start.

statement_timeout is pretty useless for that purpose, because it limits
the time on a per-statement basis. It would cancel the COPY of any
tables larger than X, but if you have multiple tables (a partitioned
table, perhaps) just below the threshold, they would all be dumped even
though the cumulative time is well beyond statement_timeout.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Denne 2008-04-17 20:32:01 Re: count(*) performance improvement ideas
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-04-17 19:28:04 Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-04-17 20:53:08 Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-04-17 16:51:52 Re: Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout