Tom Lane wrote:
> "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> If we don't want to meddle with xmltype/bytea/VarChar at all, we'll
>>> have to revert those changes, and I'll have to seriously scale back
>>> the cleanup patch I was about to post.
>> Still not sure where we stand on the above. To cast, or not to cast?
> I dunno. I know there was previously some handwaving about representing
> XML values in some more intelligent fashion than a plain text string,
> but I have no idea if anyone is likely to do anything about it in the
> foreseeable future.
It seems very unlikely to me.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-04-16 15:51:02|
|Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-04-16 15:27:59|
|Subject: Re: Improving planner variable handling |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Brendan Jurd||Date: 2008-04-16 16:42:25|
|Subject: Re: Reference by output in : \d <table_name>|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-04-16 15:16:25|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Text <-> C string |