| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| Date: | 2008-04-01 02:12:06 |
| Message-ID: | 47F199F6.8000504@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane wrote:
> The main reason I wanted to make some noise about this is to find out
> if anyone is actually trying to call eval_const_expressions (or
> relation_excluded_by_constraints, which it turned out needed to change
> also) from 8.3 add-on code. If anyone squawks we could think about a
> faster update ...
>
>
>
That assumes that someone working on using the planner hooks will read
this thread - which might be reasonable - I guess they number of likely
users is fairly small. But if they might miss it then it would be best
to fix it ASAP, ISTM.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-01 05:13:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Connection to PostgreSQL Using Certificate: Wrong Permissions on Private Key File |
| Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2008-04-01 02:03:14 | Re: [PATCHES] [badalex@gmail.com: Re: [BUGS] Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-01 05:35:24 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-01 01:51:08 | Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |