Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date: 2008-04-01 02:12:06
Message-ID: 47F199F6.8000504@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc

Tom Lane wrote:
> The main reason I wanted to make some noise about this is to find out
> if anyone is actually trying to call eval_const_expressions (or
> relation_excluded_by_constraints, which it turned out needed to change
> also) from 8.3 add-on code.  If anyone squawks we could think about a
> faster update ...
>
> 			
>   

That assumes that someone working on using the planner hooks will read 
this thread - which might be reasonable - I guess they number of likely 
users is fairly small. But if they might miss it then it would be best 
to fix it ASAP, ISTM.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-01 05:13:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Connection to PostgreSQL Using Certificate: Wrong Permissions on Private Key File
Previous:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2008-04-01 02:03:14
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [badalex@gmail.com: Re: [BUGS] Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited]

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-01 05:35:24
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-01 01:51:08
Subject: Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group