> a column definition list is required for functions returning "record"
> It seems a BUG
I don't think so. We can say it is a missing feature. As stated in ,
record types don't have a predefined structure -- they're placeholders.
How do you know the row structure before hand? Its structure can be
> Are you agree with my suggestion? If so will you plan to fix this BUG?
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Sam Mason||Date: 2008-03-28 16:52:33|
|Subject: Re: Redundant explicit field name/types description while select from function with return type of record|
|Previous:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2008-03-28 15:43:59|
|Subject: Re: FOR-IN-EXECUTE: FOR does not replanned on each entry to
the FOR loop|