Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Incomplete docs for restore_command for hotstandby

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Bertheau <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Incomplete docs for restore_command for hotstandby
Date: 2008-03-28 15:01:33
Message-ID: 47ED084D.9030207@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 17:56 +0600, Markus Bertheau wrote:
>> The FIXME of course needs replacement by someone in the know.
> 
> Doc patch edited to include all of Markus' points, tidy up some related
> text and fix typos.
> 
> Good to apply to HEAD.

Committed to HEAD with minor fixes.

What's our policy wrt. back-patching doc changes? This seems applicable 
to older versions as well, but do we do that?

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2008-03-28 15:09:44
Subject: Re: Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-28 14:58:05
Subject: Re: FOR-IN-EXECUTE: FOR does not replanned on each entry to the FOR loop

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-03-28 15:03:49
Subject: Re: [WIP] Keeping track of snapshots
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-03-28 14:58:02
Subject: Re: [WIP] Keeping track of snapshots

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group