Re: [PATCHES] Incomplete docs for restore_command for hotstandby

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Bertheau <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Incomplete docs for restore_command for hotstandby
Date: 2008-03-28 15:01:33
Message-ID: 47ED084D.9030207@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 17:56 +0600, Markus Bertheau wrote:
>> The FIXME of course needs replacement by someone in the know.
>
> Doc patch edited to include all of Markus' points, tidy up some related
> text and fix typos.
>
> Good to apply to HEAD.

Committed to HEAD with minor fixes.

What's our policy wrt. back-patching doc changes? This seems applicable
to older versions as well, but do we do that?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2008-03-28 15:09:44 Re: Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-28 14:58:05 Re: FOR-IN-EXECUTE: FOR does not replanned on each entry to the FOR loop

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-28 15:03:49 Re: [WIP] Keeping track of snapshots
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-03-28 14:58:02 Re: [WIP] Keeping track of snapshots