Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey(dot)Zubkovsky(at)transas(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
Date: 2008-03-27 00:03:41
Message-ID: 47EAE45D.8050902@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>>> The real question here is whether Windows' stat() is telling the truth
>>>> about how much filesystem space has actually been allocated to a file.
>>>> It seems entirely possible that it's not; but if it is, then I think we
>>>> have a problem.
>>>>
>
>
>>> Has this been examined by a Windows hacker?
>>>
>
>
>> If someone can suggest a test program I'll be happy to run it.
>>
>
> One thing that would be good is just to see who else can reproduce
> the original observation:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2008-03/msg00041.php
>
> It might occur only on some versions of Windows, for instance.
>
>
>

I have reproduced it in XP-Pro/SP2 running in a VMWare machine on an FC6
host.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-27 01:08:56 Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-26 15:41:32 Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-27 01:08:56 Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-03-26 23:54:50 Re: Proposal: improve shutdown during online backup