From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based |
Date: | 2008-03-22 15:30:16 |
Message-ID: | 47E52608.1080003@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Based on past history I don't think we will ever get agreement, so
>>> either we do it ourselves or we move to a new domain that we do control.
>>>
>>> I thought we could make changes to the domain.
>> I can, but it can be changed so that I cannot in seconds. We *need*
>> agreement otherwise this could get extremely messy. Has anyone from
>> -core other than me actually asked yet?
>
> No, but it seems like a waste of time to even try.
If -core can deliver an actual decision on this, I don't see why it
wouldn't happen. Let's not assume failure before we've tried. But I do
believe we need a decision from -core, just vocal members on this list
is obviously not enough (because we've tried that).
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-22 15:34:38 | Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-22 15:27:00 | Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based |