Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?
Date: 2010-12-29 18:42:04
Message-ID: 47D4C790-B63A-4315-BE64-5A3AB389846E@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 29, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Is it really stable enough for bin/? My impression of the state of
> affairs is that there is nothing whatsoever about replication that
> is really stable yet.

Well, that's not stopping us from shipping a core feature called "replication". I'll defer to others on how mature pg_streamrecv is, but if it's no worse than replication in general I think putting it in bin/ is the right thing to do.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-12-29 18:44:27 Re: TODO item for pg_ctl and server detection
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-12-29 18:35:07 Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either