Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Date: 2008-03-05 15:05:30
Message-ID: 47CEB6BA.8020503@archonet.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> David Fetter wrote:
>>>> If you really need to embed an
>>>> SQL engine in a binary, consider the excellent
>>>> <a href="http://www.sqlite.org/">SQLite</a>
>> or <a href="http://http://www.firebirdsql.org/">Firebird</a>
>>
>>>> for the purpose.
>> Just to be fair.
> 
> sqlite seems much more appropriate for embedding.

It's certainly the lightest DB I'm aware of, but Firebird does have an 
embedded mode (apparentl - I tend to use a different DB :-)

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-05 15:09:38
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2008-03-05 15:05:27
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Documenting a DB schema

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group