Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard

From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard
Date: 2008-02-28 23:52:27
Message-ID: 47C7493B.4030606@sun.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is c.h the right place to include this?  The probes are only in the backend 
> code, so perhaps postgres.h would be more appropriate.  Or just include it in 
> the .c files that need it, of which there are only 3.
>   
I think putting probes.h in c.h is the right place. It's true that the 
probes are only in the backend now and only in a few files, but in the 
future I can foresee probes added to more files in the backend, the 
procedural language code or any of the commands (initdb, psql, etc).

Regards,
-Robert


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2008-02-29 00:37:53
Subject: tuplestore_putvalues()
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-02-28 23:18:14
Subject: Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group