Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Matt Miller <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work
Date: 2006-12-01 00:40:48
Message-ID: 47C73E7A-3F37-422D-ADD2-72877D5F524D@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Nov 21, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Matt Miller wrote:
>> BTW, have you given EnterpriseDB a try?
>
> I looked at it a year or more ago, but I decided it wasn't the type of
> approach I wanted. I want to focus on getting Oracle DBs migrated to
> Postgres proper. If I have to hack Postgres to ease the transition
> I'd
> rather do that than migrate to another commercial offering.
>
> Thanks for the reminder, though, I'll probably take another look, just
> to see what they're up to.

Well, EnterpriseDB supports both PostgreSQL and Oracle syntax, so it
does ease migration since you don't have to migrate every last piece
of code at once. It'd probably be worth your time to download it and
give it a try, but then again I'm biased. :)
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Bodenstab 2006-12-01 00:42:32 Re: Create index on array element?
Previous Message wheel 2006-12-01 00:15:40 Restore database from files (not dump files)?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2006-12-01 07:16:41 Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks
Previous Message Matteo Beccati 2006-11-30 23:53:56 Re: Notify enhancement