Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>>> Why should it complain more or less than about the SUBSYS.o
>>> It has a hard-wired rule not to complain about files named *.o.
>> Well, we could name the output file SUBSYS.o if that is not too confusing. :)
> Yeah, it probably is. D'Arcy's suggestion of modifying our
> CVSROOT/cvsignore file seems better.
+1. Calling it something like foo.o when it isn't an object file would
be horrible. This should be a simple one-off operation.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-02-26 15:36:16|
|Subject: Re: Bulk loading performance improvements|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-02-26 15:28:17|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2008-02-26 15:32:30|
|Subject: pgsql: Add information about format modifiers that apply to numeric |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-02-26 15:12:04|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the |