Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Tatsuhito Kasahara <kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes
Date: 2008-02-25 16:41:44
Message-ID: 47C2EFC8.7090505@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
>   
>> Is there any currently supported platform which 
>> does not have uint64?
>>     
>
> I don't know, and neither do you.
>
>   
>   

Maybe we should look at some reasonable way of getting the info out of a 
compiled instance. How about if we get pg_config to output the value of 
INT64_IS_BUSTED? Then we could add a step to the buildfarm client to 
catch all the output from pg_config.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-02-25 16:50:11
Subject: Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-02-25 16:21:18
Subject: Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group