Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Tatsuhito Kasahara <kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes
Date: 2008-02-25 16:41:44
Message-ID: 47C2EFC8.7090505@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Is there any currently supported platform which
>> does not have uint64?
>>
>
> I don't know, and neither do you.
>
>
>

Maybe we should look at some reasonable way of getting the info out of a
compiled instance. How about if we get pg_config to output the value of
INT64_IS_BUSTED? Then we could add a step to the buildfarm client to
catch all the output from pg_config.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-02-25 16:50:11 Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-25 16:21:18 Re: Fix pgstatindex using for large indexes