Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
>>> I'm wondering whether something simple and rule-based might
>>> help catch a lot of this before we start Bayes work on them.
>>> I mean, "Casino slots" in the title is a pretty easy catch :)
>> +1. SpamAssassin on a very conservative setting would catch
>> well over 90% of the crap I have to reject-quiet in -general.
>
> Graylisting would reject a lot of the crap without any extra effort,
> *before* it hits the spam filter.
It is my understanding that the mailing lists do greylist.
Joshua D. Drake