Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX

From: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX
Date: 2008-02-19 21:58:19
Message-ID: 47BB50FB.4060608@langille.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Erik Jones wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> We're using PostgreSQL 8.1.11 on AIX 5.3 and we've been doing some
>> playing around
>> with various settings. So far, we've (I say we, but it's another guy
>> doing the work) found
>> that open_datasync seems better than fsync. By how much, we have not
>> yet determined,
>> but initial observations are promising.
>
> Here's a good explanation (by the Greg Smith) on the different sync
> methods. It basically says that if you have open_datasync available,
> it'll probably beat everything else.

Where is that explanation?

--
Dan Langille

BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Jones 2008-02-19 22:09:41 Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX
Previous Message Erik Jones 2008-02-19 21:32:02 Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?