| From: | Thomas Zaksek <zaksek(at)ptt(dot)uni-due(dot)de> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Join Query Perfomance Issue | 
| Date: | 2008-02-13 11:45:04 | 
| Message-ID: | 47B2D840.6060802@ptt.uni-due.de | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance | 
We have tried some recoding now, using a materialized view we could 
reduce the query to a join over too tables without any functions inside 
the query, for example:
explain analyse SELECT '12.11.2007 18:04:00 UTC' AS zeit,
                       'M' AS ganglinientyp,
                       zs_de,
                   j_ges,
                       j_lkw,
                       v_pkw,
                       v_lkw,
                   p_bel
                   FROM  messungen_v_dat_2007_11_12 m
                       LEFT JOIN messwerte_mv w on w.nr = m.messpunkt
                       WHERE  m.ganglinientyp = 'M'   
               AND 992 = m.minute_tag;
Nested Loop Left Join  (cost=0.00..32604.48 rows=3204 width=14) (actual 
time=11.991..2223.227 rows=2950 loops=1)
   ->  Index Scan using 
messungen_v_dat_2007_11_12_messpunkt_minute_tag_idx on 
messungen_v_dat_2007_11_12 m  (cost=0.00..5371.09 rows=3204 width=4) 
(actual time=0.152..12.385 rows=2950 loops=1)
         Index Cond: ((ganglinientyp = 'M'::bpchar) AND (992 = minute_tag))
   ->  Index Scan using messwerte_mv_nr_idx on messwerte_mv w  
(cost=0.00..8.49 rows=1 width=18) (actual time=0.730..0.734 rows=1 
loops=2950)
         Index Cond: (w.nr = m.messpunkt)
 Total runtime: 2234.143 ms
(6 rows)
To me this plan looks very clean and nearly optimal, BUT ~2seconds for 
the nested loop can't be that good, isn't it?
The behavior of this query and the database is quite a mystery for me, 
yesterday i had it running in about 100ms, today i started testing with 
the same query and 2000-3000ms :(
Could this be some kind of a postgresql server/configuration problem? 
This queries are very perfomance dependend, they are called a lot of 
times in a comlex physical real time simulation of traffic systems. 
200ms would be ok here, but >1sec is perhaps not functional.
The old version just used one big (partitioned) table without any joins, 
performing this query in 10-300ms, depended on the server load.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rory Campbell-Lange | 2008-02-13 13:12:06 | Small DB Server Advice | 
| Previous Message | Thomas Zaksek | 2008-02-13 11:17:29 | Re: Join Query Perfomance Issue |