Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?

From: Peter Wilson <petew(at)yellowhawk(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Swaminathan Saikumar <swami(at)giveexam(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
Date: 2008-01-31 00:55:28
Message-ID: 47A11C80.5070903@yellowhawk.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Swaminathan Saikumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to PostGreSql.
>
> http://searchyourwebhost.com/web-hosting/articles/insight-database-hosting-using-sql
What a wonderful article - it's almost worth keeping a copy. It's so bad 
it's difficult to know where to start. I think my favourite has to be :
+ MSSql being massive is considered to have the maximum scalability for 
database hosting.

And I just love the comment on both MySQL and Postgres about GPL and BSD 
being 'too open' - meaning?

Pete
>
> Check out the link. I am starting out on a new personal project & had 
> zeroed in on PostGreSql with Mono-ASP.NET as ideal for my needs, 
> mainly owing to a PostGreSql whitepaper.
> Now, I chanced upon the article above. I've pasted the cons as 
> mentioned in the article, and would like the community feedback on it, 
> especially with regards to the "inferior Data Storage mechanism".
>
> The cons of PostgreSql Hosting
> * Performance considerations: Inserts and Updates into the PostgreSql 
> database is much slower compared to MySql. PostgreSql hosting thus 
> might slow down the display of the web page online.
> * BSD license issues: Since PostgreSql comes under the Berkeley 
> license scheme, this is again considered to be too open.
> * Availability of inferior Data Storage mechanism: PostgreSql uses 
> Postgres storage system, which is not considered to be transaction sae 
> during PostgreSql hosting.
> * Its not far-flung: While MySql hosting and MSSql hosting have deeply 
> penetrated into the market, PostgreSql hosting still remains to be 
> passive in the database hosting market.
> * Non-availability of required assistance for PostgreSql hosting: 
> Assistance is being provided via mailing lists. However there is no 
> guarantee that the issue faced during PostgreSql hosting would be 
> resolved.
>
> Thanks!


In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-01-31 00:56:53
Subject: Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2008-01-31 00:52:34
Subject: Re: monitoring fragmentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group