--On torsdag, januari 13, 2005 17.03.41 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net> writes:
>> How do you mean they look far off?
>> Seq Scan on group_data (cost=0.00..47544.43 rows=114164 width=43)
>> (actual time=114.015..1334.479 rows=4 loops=1)
> 114164 estimated vs 4 actual rows is pretty far off. Perhaps something
> skewed about the data distribution?
Well, it might seem strange, but it is a quite normal data distribution for
this application, believe me.
>> If you want, I can send you the data.
> If it's not too huge, sure, send it to me off-list.
I'm doing that now.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Fuhr||Date: 2005-01-13 22:42:33|
|Subject: Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)|
|Previous:||From: John Hansen||Date: 2005-01-13 22:05:57|
|Subject: Re: Bug? 8.0 does not use partial index|