Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Date: 2008-01-18 01:37:23
Message-ID: 479002D3.9010200@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>   
>> I agree. I remain of the opinion that this is not a problem than can be 
>> solved purely within the bounds of postgres.
>>     
>
> I agree.  Please comment on my proposed solution.
>
>   

I'm not sure tmp cleaners will work that well against a determined spoofer.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-01-18 01:50:40
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-18 01:34:07
Subject: Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-01-18 01:50:40
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-01-18 00:47:26
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group