>>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at  4:29 PM, in message <23789(dot)1199485772(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote: 
> Can't do much with this without seeing the table and view definitions
> involved.
 
Understood.  It was while I was putting that together that it
struck me as familiar.  They are the same as in this thread.
 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-10/msg00087.php
 
I didn't figure there was much point re-posting them versus
referencing that thread, but I can do so if it's helpful.
 
-Kevin
 

In response to

• Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 at 2008-01-04 22:29:32 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 at 2008-01-04 22:46:59 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Kevin Grittner	Date: 2008-01-04 22:44:27
	Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in8.3beta4
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-01-04 22:40:22
	Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Kevin Grittner	Date: 2008-01-04 22:44:27
	Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in8.3beta4
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-01-04 22:40:22
	Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4