Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 16:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>   
>> Paranoia would
>> suggest forbidding *any* form of ALTER TABLE when there are pending
>> trigger events, but maybe that's unnecessarily strong.
>>     
>
> That works for me. Such a combination makes no sense, so banning it is
> the right thing to do.
>
>   

+1. Doesn't make much sense to me either.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers at 2008-01-02 18:16:13 from Simon Riggs

Responses

• Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers at 2008-01-03 07:04:00 from Gokulakannan Somasundaram

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Sam Mason	Date: 2008-01-03 00:41:04
	Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2008-01-02 18:16:13
	Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers