Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 16:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Paranoia would
>> suggest forbidding *any* form of ALTER TABLE when there are pending
>> trigger events, but maybe that's unnecessarily strong.
> That works for me. Such a combination makes no sense, so banning it is
> the right thing to do.
+1. Doesn't make much sense to me either.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Sam Mason||Date: 2008-01-03 00:41:04|
|Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-01-02 18:16:13|
|Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers|