Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers

From: Andrew Dunstan <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers
Date: 2008-01-02 18:32:55
Message-ID: 477BD8D7.1070708@postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 16:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>   
>> Paranoia would
>> suggest forbidding *any* form of ALTER TABLE when there are pending
>> trigger events, but maybe that's unnecessarily strong.
>>     
>
> That works for me. Such a combination makes no sense, so banning it is
> the right thing to do.
>
>   

+1. Doesn't make much sense to me either.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Sam MasonDate: 2008-01-03 00:41:04
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-02 18:16:13
Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group