Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> I got dump of affected two blocks from Alex and it seems that both blocks were
>> overwritten together with some 128bytes length structure (there some pattern)
>> and complete damaged size is 9728bytes (first block is overwritten completely
>> and second one only at the beginning), but another buffer from another relation
>> could be overwritten too.
> I don't understand this 9728 bytes. Postgres blocks are 8192 bytes. Are you
> saying one whole block is trashed and then part, but not all, of the next
> What's the block size of the ZFS filesystem? And what exactly does the trash
> data look like?
ZFS has dynamic block size (max 128kB), but this system runs on Linux probably
ext3 FS. Please, ale can you confirm used filesystem?
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: NikhilS||Date: 2007-12-19 11:06:06|
|Subject: Re: BUG #3829: Wrong index reporting from pgAdmin III (v1.8.0 rev 6766-6767)|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2007-12-19 10:03:41|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3829: Wrong index reporting from pgAdmin III (v1.8.0