Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Date: 2012-07-02 23:01:14
Message-ID: 4762.1341270074@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> I don't foresee more generic needs here, unless you can convince me that
> we need both a. a full stack of arbitrarily nested commands and b. a way
> to match and target any level of that stack.

Um ... isn't the burden of proof the other way around here?  That is,
what's the argument that we *don't* need that?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2012-07-02 23:33:36
Subject: Re: Patch: add conversion from pg_wchar to multibyte
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-07-02 22:59:38
Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group