| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Time to update list of contributors |
| Date: | 2007-11-28 16:53:43 |
| Message-ID: | 474D9D17.3080306@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +0000
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Why not Hackers? Noone is a 'member' of anything except core or mayber
>> the web/infrastructure team.
>
> Define Hacker. And I could argue that some are members of PGDG.
Says he who only the other day muttered something about how PGDG wasn't
a defined entity :-)
> What
> about those who provide just as much time and energy in advocacy as
> others do on -heackers? What about people that are working on external
> projects only such as Slony or PLproxy?
The latter are still hackers using the definition we're likely to agree
on (ie. not a cracker). Both groups are 'Contributors' though. Maybe
just use 'Regular contributors' and 'Occasional contributors'. Or major
and minor. Or something entirely different.
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-28 16:57:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to update list of contributors |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-11-28 16:40:30 | Re: String encoding during connection "handshake" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-28 16:57:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to update list of contributors |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-28 16:32:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to update list of contributors |