Re: Quality and Performance

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quality and Performance
Date: 2007-11-27 23:45:26
Message-ID: 474CAC16.6000103@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>>> Should we do this as part of core, or as a separate pgfoundry project?
>>>
>
>
>> Core, please. This is mainline -hackers material.
>>
>
> Huh? The buildfarm isn't in core, why would a performfarm be?
>
>
>

It's the tests I think belong in core, not the farm software. Currently
buildfarm performs functionality tests that are also in core.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2007-11-27 23:56:14 Re: Quality and Performance
Previous Message Guillaume Smet 2007-11-27 23:39:13 Re: Quality and Performance