| From: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD |
| Date: | 2007-11-12 10:23:13 |
| Message-ID: | 47382991.3050708@Sheeky.Biz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:27:02PM +0100, Dimitri wrote:
>> As well to demonstrate OS parallelism it's not so impressive to see
>> 4CPU server results rather 8CPU or 32threaded Niagara... Don't know
>> why they did not present similar performance graphs for these
>> platform, strange no?...
>
> I guess it's because their Niagara support is still very raw, and besides,
> it's not a very common platform.
>
> /* Steinar */
Not sure how much coding would need to be done for Niagra chips but I
would think that it is more likely a problem of getting the funds so
they can have one to work on.
--
Shane Ambler
pgSQL(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz
Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2007-11-12 14:51:30 | difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? |
| Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2007-11-12 10:17:57 | Re: work_mem and shared_buffers |