Re: Vacuum goes worse

Tom Lane a écrit :
> "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> On 10/16/07, St=E9phane Schildknecht
>> <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> That's also why I am so disappointed vacuum doesn't give me these 4
>>> hints lines.
>>>
>
>
>> What kind of error, or output, does it give you at the end? Any hint
>> as to why they're missing?
>>
>
> If you're talking about the FSM statistics display, that only gets
> printed by a database-wide VACUUM (one that doesn't name a specific
> table).
>

Yes, I am. The command line is (in a shell script whom ouput is
redirected in a global file) :

vacuumdb -d $DBNAME -p $DBPORT -U $DBUSR -z -v

That does not explain why we don't get FSM statitics display. The output
ends with:
INFO: vacuuming "public.sometable"
INFO: "sometable": removed 62 row versions in 3 pages
DETAIL: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
INFO: "sometable": found 62 removable, 5 nonremovable row versions in 5
pages
DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
There were 534 unused item pointers.
0 pages are entirely empty.
CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
INFO: analyzing "public.sometable"
INFO: "sometable": scanned 5 of 5 pages, containing 5 live rows and 0
dead rows; 5 rows in sample, 5 estimated total rows
VACUUM

Best regards,

Stéphane