Re: Small change needed to support Greenplum DB

Thanks Luke - fix committed for 1.8 using the DISTINCT ON version of the
query.

Regards, Dave

Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Yes it does!
>
> - Luke
>
> Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:21 AM Eastern Standard Time
> To: Luke Lonergan
> Cc: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Small change needed to support
> Greenplum DB
>
> Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A customer of ours is using pgAgent with Greenplum Database and needs a
>> change to one of the queries used by pgAgent to allow it to work with
>> Greenplum.
>>
>> Here is the conversation:
>>
> _http://groups.google.com/group/pgsql.bugs/browse_thread/thread/27866354fa4d7a5e/60e6e5de3c5156d4#60e6e5de3c5156d4
>>
>> _The problem is that Greenplum does not support some correlated
>> subqueries, so Jon created a version of the query that is both faster
>> and does not use a correlated subquery.
>>
>> The requested change is from this in pgaJob.cpp:
>
>
> Hi Luke,
>
> Does Greenplum support DISTINCT ON? Specifically,
>
> SELECT j.*, cl.*, ag.*, sub.jlgstatus
> FROM pgagent.pga_job j JOIN
> pgagent.pga_jobclass cl ON cl.jclid=jobjclid LEFT OUTER JOIN
> pgagent.pga_jobagent ag ON ag.jagpid=jobagentid JOIN
> (SELECT DISTINCT ON (jlgjobid) jlgstatus, jlgjobid
> FROM pgagent.pga_joblog
> ORDER BY jlgjobid, jlgid desc) sub ON sub.jlgjobid = j.jobid
> -- + restriction +
> ORDER BY jobname;
>
> Regards, Dave.
>