Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Speaking of this - could you please comment on my idea about the release
>> process for next time? It's not as important for beta, but it still is...
> Well, I think we need a fully written-out timeline. I did this for 8.0;
> I'll put one up on the wiki for this release.
Sure, that's a good thing (even though we all know what happens to
timelines when reality hits them, but it's a good thing to work from).
But that doesn't in itself deal with the main issue, which is the order
in which things are posted.
>>> -- The beta version of the docs needs to go up at /docs/8.3/static or
>>> interactive (I don't care, just get it up)
>> It's there on both, site is rebuilding right now. Expect it to be on the
>> mirrors within 1-2 hours.
> OK, I'll do the pgsql-announce in 2 hours.
Sounds good. I've just verified, and I can pull /docs/8.3/static now
from static mirrors.
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2007-10-08 17:19:26|
|Subject: Re: [PGWEB-COMMITS] By xzilla: Allow beta documentation to be
referenced as /beta/ and allow|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2007-10-08 17:01:07|
|Subject: Re: [PGWEB-COMMITS] By xzilla: Allow beta documentation to be referenced
as /beta/ and allow|