Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Seems it would be best to apply this
> nomenclature consistently, and simply drop the name "postmaster" from
> use.
> 

+1  I agree the term postmaster references in the docs, etc should
go away - with perhaps the exception of one faq that say that
postmaster's a deprecated name in case anyone encounters it
in other web sites or old docs.

PS: Oh it's so hard to resist saying it should be renamed
"postmaSQLter".

In response to

• Use of "postmaster" at 2007-10-03 22:27:50 from Brendan Jurd

pgsql-docs by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2007-10-05 17:22:01
	Subject: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
Previous:	From: Brendan Jurd	Date: 2007-10-03 23:54:12
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster"

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-10-04 04:47:13
	Subject: Not *quite* there on ecpg fixes
Previous:	From: Stephan Szabo	Date: 2007-10-04 01:06:22
	Subject: Re: Why does the sequence skip a number with generate_series?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Hiroshi Saito	Date: 2007-10-04 02:01:41
	Subject: Re: initdb of regression test failed.
Previous:	From: Brendan Jurd	Date: 2007-10-03 23:54:12
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster"