| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Use of "postmaster" |
| Date: | 2007-10-04 01:37:18 |
| Message-ID: | 470443CE.70601@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Seems it would be best to apply this
> nomenclature consistently, and simply drop the name "postmaster" from
> use.
>
+1 I agree the term postmaster references in the docs, etc should
go away - with perhaps the exception of one faq that say that
postmaster's a deprecated name in case anyone encounters it
in other web sites or old docs.
PS: Oh it's so hard to resist saying it should be renamed
"postmaSQLter".
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-10-05 17:22:01 | PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency |
| Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-10-03 23:54:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-04 04:47:13 | Not *quite* there on ecpg fixes |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2007-10-04 01:06:22 | Re: Why does the sequence skip a number with generate_series? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2007-10-04 02:01:41 | Re: initdb of regression test failed. |
| Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-10-03 23:54:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster" |