Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Use of "postmaster"

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Use of "postmaster"
Date: 2007-10-04 01:37:18
Message-ID: 470443CE.70601@cheapcomplexdevices.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Seems it would be best to apply this
> nomenclature consistently, and simply drop the name "postmaster" from
> use.
> 

+1  I agree the term postmaster references in the docs, etc should
go away - with perhaps the exception of one faq that say that
postmaster's a deprecated name in case anyone encounters it
in other web sites or old docs.

PS: Oh it's so hard to resist saying it should be renamed
"postmaSQLter".

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-10-05 17:22:01
Subject: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
Previous:From: Brendan JurdDate: 2007-10-03 23:54:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster"

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-04 04:47:13
Subject: Not *quite* there on ecpg fixes
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2007-10-04 01:06:22
Subject: Re: Why does the sequence skip a number with generate_series?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Hiroshi SaitoDate: 2007-10-04 02:01:41
Subject: Re: initdb of regression test failed.
Previous:From: Brendan JurdDate: 2007-10-03 23:54:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group