| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tomasz Myrta <jasiek(at)lamer(dot)pl>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dynamic-static date once again |
| Date: | 2001-09-17 14:11:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4702.1000735899@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
>> I think we have agreed that 'current' is a Bad Idea and should be
>> eliminated from the date/time datatypes...
> I've started purging it from the timestamp code I'm working on for 7.2.
Oh good. Let's not forget to review the pg_proc entries after that
happens, to see which ones can safely be marked cachable.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-09-17 15:18:52 | Re: Performance and 72.devel |
| Previous Message | pgsql-bugs | 2001-09-17 11:45:28 | Bug #453: |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin | 2001-09-17 14:19:44 | BindColumn and Bulk Copy |
| Previous Message | Turbo Fredriksson | 2001-09-17 12:13:31 | Re: Hot spare PSQL server |