From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OpenSSL Applink |
Date: | 2007-09-28 16:30:29 |
Message-ID: | 46FD2C25.60106@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 9/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>> Then I think I'd rather disable use of client certs for the offending
>>>> openssl versions in libpq, or let the apps die and refer the customers
>>>> to the openssl people to lobby them for a sane solution.
>>> If this were 8.0 I'd agree, but thats not a nice solution for those
>>> already using client certs (such as the pgAdmin user who brought this to
>>> my attention).
>> Doesn't really matter. Even if we were willing to hack our own client
>> apps like that (which I'm not), we can *not* transfer such a requirement
>> onto every libpq-using application. It's just not acceptable.
>
> Is it possible to use GNUTLS on Windows?
>
No, I don't think so. I didn't think we accepted Martijn's(?) patch for
it anyway?
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-09-28 16:40:25 | Re: OpenSSL Applink |
Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2007-09-28 16:26:46 | Re: OpenSSL Applink |