Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: OpenSSL Applink

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Applink
Date: 2007-09-28 16:30:29
Message-ID: 46FD2C25.60106@postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 9/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>> Then I think I'd rather disable use of client certs for the offending
>>>> openssl versions in libpq, or let the apps die and refer the customers
>>>> to the openssl people to lobby them for a sane solution.
>>> If this were 8.0 I'd agree, but thats not a nice solution for those
>>> already using client certs (such as the pgAdmin user who brought this to
>>> my attention).
>> Doesn't really matter.  Even if we were willing to hack our own client
>> apps like that (which I'm not), we can *not* transfer such a requirement
>> onto every libpq-using application.  It's just not acceptable.
> 
> Is it possible to use GNUTLS on Windows?
> 

No, I don't think so. I didn't think we accepted Martijn's(?) patch for 
it anyway?

Regards, Dave

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-09-28 16:40:25
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Applink
Previous:From: Marko KreenDate: 2007-09-28 16:26:46
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Applink

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group