Robert Treat wrote:
> Example may have been the wrong word. That paragraph explains what single
> master is explicitly, but never explains what multiple master is explicitly
> (ie. more than one node accepting writes, and then using 2PC or conflict
> resultion to push changes around). So maybe just provide a more explicit
> definition of MM.
I've changed that and added paragraph about multi-master replication
explicitly. Additionally, I'm now mentioning the alternative terms
master-slave as well as primary and secondary.
A paragraph about failover and standby has been added. And the eager vs
lazy text has been made clearer (hopefully).
Other additions: shared-disk vs shared-nothing, vertical and horizontal
partitioning and a rant about 'grids'.
Thank you for your inputs.
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2007-09-07 20:50:27|
|Subject: Re: Request to add EnterpriseDB Postgres to Download page|
|Previous:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2007-09-06 23:50:08|
|Subject: Re: pugs.postgresql.org down AGAIN!|