| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| Date: | 2007-08-29 22:52:47 |
| Message-ID: | 46D5F8BF.30703@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> I'm very strongly in favor of having this documentation. However, I think
>> it might make sense to put "Contrib Modules" as a section under either
>> "Reference" or "Appendices". Also, I don't think it's necessary to make
>> each command option a separate subchapter, but I can see how that would be
>> hard to avoid in an automated system.
>>
>
> It's not an automated system, README files have different structures so it's
> all manual work. That's why I asked how you think it should be organized.
> Anyone else thinks we should put it in Reference or Appendixes?
>
I would far rather have a new top level heading. Something like
"Standard Modules and Tools". (Please avoid the use of the word
"contrib"). If not, than as a sub-chapter of "References". I don't think
it belongs in the Appendixes.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2007-08-30 09:31:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| Previous Message | Albert Cervera i Areny | 2007-08-29 22:37:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-29 23:05:26 | Re: reindexdb hangs |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-29 22:45:57 | Re: text search function renaming |