Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Liam O'Duibhir <liamod(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-29 19:41:06
Message-ID: 46D5CBD2.1090305@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Liam O'Duibhir wrote:
> +1 I vote in favour of the name change.
> ...
> Personally, I think if the new name takes 5 (or even more) years to
> ‘settle in’ and become the norm, that will be a reasonable outcome.

Indeed. HP Sales people and support don't yell at customers
for calling them Hewlett Packard even today - and hp.com still
shows "Official Hewlett-Packard site" in it's Meta Description tags.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Derek Rodner 2007-08-29 20:10:49 An "official" "unofficial" Postgres Poll
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2007-08-29 19:37:01 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)