| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ACID (was Re: Reliable and fast ...) |
| Date: | 2007-08-29 16:22:14 |
| Message-ID: | 46D59D36.2040501@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/07 11:20, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 08/29/07 10:40, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>>>> Argh!!! The RDBMS that I typically use defaults to SERIALIZABLE.
>>> SERIALIZABLE is really slow :). You should look into SERIALIZABLE only
>>> for those transactions that need it. There is also SELECT FOR UPDATE.
>> We use SERIALIZABLE (with all it's locking "issues") to guarantee
>> the I in ACID. ISTM that READ COMMITTED can only deliver "ACD".
>
> You are using serializable for select statements?
READ ONLY, which defaults to SERIALIZABLE.
(It's not PostgreSQL...)
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG1Z02S9HxQb37XmcRAnzVAKDFFqHLuMHE1q6sgvO288bzZvZa1gCfcGWM
KUyB8HyjE3s9NfWq5GeLfvQ=
=9jB2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-29 16:38:11 | Re: Reliable and fast money transaction design |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-29 16:20:32 | Re: ACID (was Re: Reliable and fast ...) |