Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-28 15:30:51
Message-ID: 46D43FAB.2060308@lelarge.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Robert Bernier a écrit :
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007 11:06, Dave Page wrote:
>> Decibel! wrote:
>>> I think we can just as easily make the change without any real fanfare
>>> at all.
>> I'm inclined to agree. For the most part we could all just slowly change
>> things to 'Postgres'. I doubt anyone would really notice, except we'd
>> get fewer people getting it wrong!
>
> How about a vote?
>
> How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0' reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work involved out of the debate for the moment)?
>

I don't.

--
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/
http://lfs.traduc.org/
http://docs.postgresqlfr.org/ -->

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2007-08-28 15:36:13 Re: mysql proxy
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2007-08-28 15:24:45 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)