(On the GENERAL list) Kamil Srot wrote:
> Kynn Jones wrote:
>> I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question ...
> ...we use pgsql partitioning for other reasons
> and it has some of the features you want (data separation, query
> performance, ...).
> It can be worth reading:
I'm not sure the tip is really what the OP is going to need -- I think
he has a different problem in mind than that addresses -- but after a
quick R of TFM, all I can say is HOLY CR** THAT IS COOL! Postrgresql was
amazing when I first started using it at 7.2, and I'm continually
astounded by learning new features and techniques made available by the
continuing work of the development team.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-08-28 14:28:24|
|Subject: Re: Testing the other tsearch dictionaries |
|Previous:||From: Kevin Kempter||Date: 2007-08-28 12:47:29|
|Subject: Re: One database vs. hundreds?|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-08-28 12:58:44|
|Subject: Re: INSERT doc discrepancy|
|Previous:||From: Josh Trutwin||Date: 2007-08-28 12:53:13|
|Subject: Indexing Foreign Key Columns|