Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SRF rescan testing

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SRF rescan testing
Date: 2002-05-28 12:06:10
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA488792B@m0114.s-mxs.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> FOR row IN select_query LOOP
>      statements
>      RETURN NEXT row;
> END LOOP;

Informix has 
	RETURN x1, x2, x3 WITH RESUME;

This seems reasonable to me. PostgreSQL could also allow
return x with resume, where x is already a composite type.

Andreas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Olivier PRENANTDate: 2002-05-28 12:28:13
Subject: Re: WAL FILES
Previous:From: Manfred KoizarDate: 2002-05-28 09:12:06
Subject: Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group