> "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> > Here is a patch per above thread.
> Why did you change libpgtcl's build process? AFAIK no one was claiming
> that was broken.
It was definitely broken on AIX, and was also the original complaint.
Since the make stopped there the next failure in pl/tcl was not reported.
> This does not seem the right time to be making undiscussed changes in
> Makefile.shlib, either. What's with that?
I was presuming, that the patch was at this stage not applied without further
review and testing on some other port.
It is not a real big problem, but for some targets "make clean" fails to
clean libxxx.2.0 (depending on what $(shlib) is on that port) and the
libxxx.exp file without the patch.
The patch brings "clean-lib" inline with "uninstall-lib".
Unfortunately it misses to clean xxx.dll on Windows, very sorry :-(
I thought I tripplechecked. Incremental patch attached.
Description: application/octet-stream (597 bytes)
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: pwd||Date: 2001-12-18 11:32:43|
|Subject: Re: Scheduling Jobs in Postgres|
|Previous:||From: Lincoln Yeoh||Date: 2001-12-18 11:14:51|
|Subject: Re: Connection Pooling, a year later|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Greg Sabino Mullane||Date: 2001-12-18 17:55:52|
|Subject: "July" missing from datetime.c|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-12-18 00:05:13|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem compiling postgres sql --with-tcl |