| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
| Date: | 2001-11-15 16:29:50 |
| Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA42127F9@m0114.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > New patch for open item: AIX compile (Peter E, Zeugswetter)
> > (applies to today's snapshot)
> >
> > I now have a working autoconf, and was thus able to confirm, that
> > Peter's SIZEOF_INT8 check works correctly on AIX.
>
> I'm confused a bit: In the previous message you added a check for
uint64,
> in this version you removed the u?int64 checks completely. I suppose
it
> doesn't matter, but is there a reason?
AIX > 4.? and <= 4.3.3 has all four signed typedefs but no unsigned
ones.
BEOS has all eight typedefs.
So I thought that grouping signed and unsigned was ok.
Tom complained, and so I sent in another patch just now that separates
the 64's.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-15 16:30:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
| Previous Message | Roland Roberts | 2001-11-15 16:26:41 | Re: problem: index on number not honoured |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-15 16:30:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
| Previous Message | Klaus Naumann | 2001-11-15 16:28:52 | Re: Patch for Makefile race against current cvs |