Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problem on AIX with current

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem on AIX with current
Date: 2001-10-01 16:31:29
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB3A1@m0114.s-mxs.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
... cs(3)
> > Seems same as AIX 4?

Yes, identical.

> 
> Hmm, does anyone want to produce new s_lock code for AIX that uses
> compare_and_swap?  But I'm not sure that's the problem here.

I did once, but performance was worse, so I discarded it.
Since AIX 5 still has it, I see no reason to change it.

Still, testing it on AIX 5 might reveal that compare_and_swap 
is now faster, Tatsuo ?

Andreas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vince VielhaberDate: 2001-10-01 16:40:33
Subject: Re: developer's faq
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2001-10-01 16:25:30
Subject: patch contrib/intarray to current CVS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group