Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug in SQL for set returning functions

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Erwin Brandstetter <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in SQL for set returning functions
Date: 2007-07-27 08:22:18
Message-ID: 46A9AB3A.9060705@postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> Hi developers!
> 
> Testing the pgAdmin III 1.8.0  Beta 2 (Jul 25 2007, rev: 6486). Client
> Win XP, host: Debian Sarge / PG 8.1.8 and Debian Etch / PG 8.2.4
> 
> 
> I am afraid beta2 has introduced a new bug in the reverse engineering of
> SQL code. SET returning functions get two instances of the the "RETURNS
> " clause. Like this:
> 
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_demofunc(IN integer, OUT integer)
>  RETURNS SETOF record
>  RETURNS SETOF record AS
> $BODY$
> ...

My bad - fixed in SVN, thanks.

Regards, Dave

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: svnDate: 2007-07-27 10:01:07
Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r6499 - trunk/pgadmin3/pgadmin/frm
Previous:From: svnDate: 2007-07-27 08:21:37
Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r6498 - trunk/pgadmin3/pgadmin/schema

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group