Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: HOT latest patch - version 8

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: HOT latest patch - version 8
Date: 2007-07-18 10:43:36
Message-ID: 469DEED8.2000800@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com wrote:
> Any objections to changing the name of "RedirectDead"?  A RedirectDead
> ItemId is not really redirected, it's just a stub representing a dead
> tuple (the space for that tuple has been reused but an index entry may
> still point to the ItemId).  
> 
> How about "stub" or "tombstone"?

Sounds good to me. "Stub" is a bit generic, I'd go for "tombstone".

-- 
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-07-18 14:16:01
Subject: Re: execl() sentinel
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-07-18 10:16:42
Subject: SSPI authentication - patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group