Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: cache problem (v2)

From: De Leeuw Guy <G(dot)De_Leeuw(at)eurofer(dot)be>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: cache problem (v2)
Date: 2007-07-17 15:49:15
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-admin
> Yes.  _Everything_ is in a transaction in PostgreSQL.  If you don't
> explicitly do BEGIN. . .COMMIT, then the system does it implicitly
> for each statement.
>> if yes each time my trigger select a data
>> and update then the value returned by the read are the value before the
>> transaction. It's true ? if yes my question are : also in the same
>> transaction (like my trigger) ?
> Your trigger function runs inside the transaction of the calling
> statement, unless you have explicitly started a transaction. 
Not possible from a trigger

> I'm starting to get the impression you have a misunderstanding of how
> PostgreSQL works.  I think you maybe need to spend some more time
> with the manual.  If you find the English version puzzling, you can
> also work in French (at or German (I
> see a translation at
>; I dunno if
> there's a more recent one).  Sorry, AFAIK there isn't one in Dutch.
Yes true, It's my first step with postgres but also with a relationnal
But I'm sure that with COPY the data are not correctly updated and
if I edit the file loaded by the COPY command and adapt it with each
line with a command INSERT all work fine.


In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2007-07-17 16:23:06
Subject: Re: cache problem (v2)
Previous:From: Abraham, DannyDate: 2007-07-17 15:45:29
Subject: plpgsql debugger

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group